You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘adobe’ tag.

We have finished decorating the study in our house, and my wife is looking for a collection of landscape format prints to group in a series of four on one of the walls. The problem is, which images to choose?

All of my images are held in Lightroom databases. Each year I start a new Lightroom catalogue for that particular year on a new mobile hard drive. All Lightroom settings, presets and folders for that year on held on that disk. Images are placed in dated folders as they are downloaded from the camera together that are also labelled with the location. This year, for instance, I have 82 individual folders or ‘shoots’, and in those folders are all of the images taken on those shoots. Now, whilst only a small percentage of those pictures are actually fully processed and realised, it still means a lot of images to trawl through to find ones that are suitable for clients or framing etc. When you then start to look even further back at your back catalogue of images over the years the number of possible images that would be good enough to sell or use becomes even larger. Since I started digital photography in earnest three years ago, I have a collection of 22,000 images. Again, obviously most will never be used, but that is still a lot of pictures to look through.

From every shoot that you do there must be a few, perhaps only two or three, images that you feel are good enough to represent your photography, or that you think other people would be interested in. Once those images have been processed to your satisfaction, you are left with the finished jpg or tiff. To enable you to find those images quickly in the future you could meta tag them in such a way that you could search for them in the Lightroom database and bring them all up on to the screen. However, the way I archive my images means that I can only do that for the current loaded catalogue. As all my images are on separate year-dated drives this would be a time-consuming process in that I would have to mount each drive in turn and look through the images it contains.

So, my idea was this: as each shoot is completed in terms of the best images processed, they are saved into a folder on the hard drive and within the Lightroom catalogue. Within this parent folder two other folders labelled ‘Colour’ and ‘Monochrome’ are created. Within these two folders other folders are made that carry general descriptive labels, such as ‘Landscapes’, ‘Portraits’, ‘Still-Life’, ‘Buildings’,  and ‘Abstracts’. These folders will appear in both the ‘Colour’ and ‘Monochrome’ main folders and should not exceed more than five in number. In them I will put my best processed pictures that will fit broadly within the folder topics.

At the end of the year, I will copy the folder on to the new hard drive and synchronize it with the new Lightroom catalogue and then I will start to add the New Year’s best photographs to it each shoot.

This way, I should be able to find any of my best images quickly no matter what hard drive they were originally contained on.

For those who only use the one catalogue, I do urge you to use meta tags. Even if you tag the relevant images with one word e.g. ‘best’, then putting that word into the Lightroom search engine will pull all the images up labelled thus from the folder you have chosen. Choose a root folder and they will all appear on screen.


I’ve just realised that I hadn’t put an image on the blog for the photo hunt that took place at Baddesley Clinton a couple of weeks ago.

Here’s an image of the gate in the corner of the garden.


Baddesley Clinton

Baddesley Clinton

When I had originally converted the image to mono, I wasn’t really impressed with the feel or the drama of the picture – I felt there was something else I could do with it. So, I decided to enhance the light coming through the gate to give it a little bit of an eerie glow. The sunlight wasn’t really coming through the gate like that, as it wasn’t in that direction – it was to my left, so I had to introduce the light on the floor and the hint of the gate’s shadow. I darkened the edges slightly in Photoshop and then used the new ‘Radial Filter’ in Lightroom to lighten up the walls either side of the gate.


Adobe have announced that there will be no software upgrades or new Creative Suite software after the present CS6. Instead users will have to pay a monthly (or yearly) subscription in order to use the programs on the Adobe Creative Cloud. Once downloaded and installed the program will check and authorise the users subscription every 6 months to ensure that they still have the right to use the software.

Creative Cloud membership for individuals is $49.99 per month based on annual membership; existing customers who own CS3 to CS5.5 get their first year of Creative Cloud at the discounted rate of $29.99 per month. Students and teachers can get Creative Cloud for $29.99 per month.

If users just want one program, for example Photoshop, then the cost will be approximately $20 per month. The take up on the CC, Adobe say, has been phenomenal, however the company has been pilloried in blogs and on websites internet-wide for their actions.

I think my take on this is that it will no longer be possible to buy a program and own the license to use it, instead users will have to hire the facility to use Photoshop for example each month or yearly. Various bloggers have said that this could ultimately work out costlier for them and are looking elsewhere for a graphics package. I will stick with CS6 for now, Adobe say they have no plans for making Lightroom available only on CC so I shall be OK for a while. For amateur photographers however this could be bad news and will make them look elsewhere.

I wonder if we may see layers in Lightroom 6?


Details of Creative Cloud can be found here

Follow on
%d bloggers like this: